Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LAVANWAY

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 18:15, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

LAVANWAY

Not notable, so should not be in an encyclopedia. Thue | talk 15:32, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

• Why not? Kappa 18:00, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. kweee 18:15, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity, doesn't even attempt to show notability. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:36, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 05:02, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Do Not Delete. It isn't even done by him. There are two of us that are doing this to record this promising young man's future so that someday people will be able to get a detailed look at his early life. currently, history does not have enough detail on the early lives of its most important people. We hope that this will not be the case with Mr. Lavanway.
• Delete. If it were vanity we could at least userfy. Bio-stub of non-notable child surnamed LaVanway, mistitled and miscapitalized article. No reason to believe that he will someday be one of history's "most important people". If he does become one, we can write a meaningful and accurate article from scratch more readily than leaving this one online for a decade. Barno 17:08, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.