Talk:Gibson Brands

	; Archives (Index) ;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gibson Brands article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Guitarists: Equipment

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guitarists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guitarists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuitaristsWikipedia:WikiProject GuitaristsTemplate:WikiProject Guitaristsguitarist articles
	This article is supported by Guitar equipment task force.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Gibson Brands is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Norlin / Moog[edit]

Since the Gibson article is currently the official article for Norlin Musical Instruments, I feel there should be a bit more effort to give it justice. For example the Moog brand of synthesizers was apparently part of Norlin from 1971 to 1987. According to its article, Moog Music went bankrupt in 1987. Surely there's some connection with the 1986 buyout of the Gibson brand here? --BjKa (talk) 13:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 December 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Gibson (guitar company); dab page moved to base title. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:17, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gibson → Gibson Brands, Inc.
Gibson (disambiguation) → Gibson

– This page should be moved simply because Gibson is just too common of a surname to be the namespace of a guitar company (just like how Ford was moved to Ford Motor Company) and then move the disambiguation page to 'Gibson'. There's also several places and other companies called Gibson. Perhaps someone can suggest a better title than 'Gibson Brands, Inc.', but I do believe it should be moved from its current namespace. Waddles 🗩 🖉 05:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support in addition to being a common surname (which I'd think of not the company that I'd never heard of) Gibson (cocktail) gets 6,000 views compared to 8,489[[1]] for the company which alone is likely close enough. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose first proposal, support second We generally don't using Inc. for the company's initials. 180.254.166.239 (talk) 12:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Are you saying move to Gibson (guitar company)? noting that there is also Gibson Manufacturing Corporation, per WP:NCCORP the legal status suffix may be used to disambiguate or we can use a qualifier. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:14, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support though i would prefer it moved to Gibson (guitar company)—blindlynx 16:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Gibson (guitar company) as far more WP:RECOGNIZABLE than the alternatives. -- Netoholic @ 16:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose While other uses exist, the guitar company is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. A straight google search for Gibson turns up basically the guitar company as 90% of the links on the first several pages of a search. --Jayron 32 17:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jayron32: While it's true that it is the primary topic, so are Tesla, Bing, Amazon, Ford, GMC, Bellagio, and GMU. Searching either of these on Google only yields results for the company/organization/product rather than the place or surname it's named for, but they are all too common names to just be the title for an article therefore the namespace is held by a disambiguation page. Waddles 🗩 🖉 17:14, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover the pages views don't support it being the primary topic, they're simply to close to the drink—blindlynx 20:05, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Now that it's brought up, this page should be moved to Gibson (guitar company) instead of the official company's name like I suggested, per WP:RECOGNIZABLE. Waddles 🗩 🖉 17:16, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.--Ortizesp (talk) 00:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.