Talk:Edward C. Tolman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2020 and 25 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ridingj1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

using a heading for external link screwed up the first paragraph... so i just did it that way :-\. ugen64 19:32, Jan 25, 2004 (UTC)

What is S-S? --217.88.144.5 18:53, 17 Mar 2004 (UTC)

fair question! It stood for "stimulus-stimulus", and I have tweaked the article to say so. seglea 23:00, 17 Mar 2004 (UTC)

John Watson was emphatically not a radical behaviorist. His peculiar brand of behaviorism has come to be known as methodological behaviorism. The lumping together of the separate (and quite different) versions of behaviorism advocated by Watson and Skinner has been the source of untold confusions, misstatements, and untruths for the past 60 to 70 years. For a discussion of this, please verify the veracity of my assertion by reading the first two chapters of Skinner's 1974 work About Behaviorism. One would think that by now people would know this enough not to place it in a wiki article. I'm changing it to reflect the vast differences in their approaches. --Uroshnor 22:23, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Is it really relevant to mention Kahneman's Nobel prize here?? This can be taken to imply that Tolman had some important influence on Kahneman; did he?? Lebatsnok 21 Mar 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.40.9.3 (talk) 13:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a place we can mention that he was a causal racist? Quote "Truly, our subjectivistic friends are not to be blamed for suspecting a nigger in the Watsonian wood-pile." from page 220 of paper `Tolman, E.C. 1923. A behavioristic account of the emotions. Psychological review. 30, 3 (1923), 217–227.' Pifthemighty (talk) 20:34, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Edward C. Tolman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

American Quakers[edit]

I am sure I read in a book (a long time ago now) that Tolman was a devout Quaker. Does any one think that he should be added to the category "American Quakers"? Vorbee (talk) 20:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]