Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen Nelson

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 03:08, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)

Glen Nelson[edit]

Undistributed albums and unpublished books. Doesn't seem to be notable enough. Of course, with rap music sometimes music circulates widely outside of formal distribution channels, so it's possible he may be notable. -- Curps 05:10, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The lack of a face in the picture makes one pause. The article is also getting more and more crufty with each edit. Delete. Rick K 06:49, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 09:14, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
How could you delete an Intellectual with a capital I? In this case, yes we can delete. Susvolans (pigs can fly) 11:25, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete although, based on the picture, he seems to use the exact same popscreen that I do. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:57, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
Delete because this seems very suspicious (particularly the photo). Written as largely vanity, puffs of unpublished works aren't notable or verifiable. If this album does appear, then he maywarrant an article (after all, rappers aren't exactly shy retiring types to hide their talents, so rampant egotism is probably a benefit in that field), but only once we have something concrete and verifiable. Average Earthman 16:50, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete - unverifiable, smells hoaxy. Probable vanity even if true. -- Cyrius|✎ 01:00, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete for not meeting the Notability and Music Guidelines. Tuf-Kat 22:33, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.