Talk:Judas O

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Alternative music: Smashing Pumpkins Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This redirect is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is within the scope of The Smashing Pumpkins task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Title[edit]

Maybe this should be Judas Ø, seeing as that's what it says on the disc itself.--[[User:HamYoyo|HamYoyo (Talk)]] 16:20, Jun 3, 2004 (UTC)

Well, the CD case says Judas O. --Dbenbenn 22:49, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I agree, the way I see it, people title it Judas Ø because it looks neat to have an unusual character in the title of an album. It is called Judas O on both the back of the CD case and in the booklet. It seems reason enough to use an O instead of an Ø. Perhaps the title of this article can be "Judas O", and have a note in the introduction paragraph like "(also known as Judas Ø)"124.177.104.225 (talk) 14:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pages[edit]

I don't understand why Rotten Apples and Judas 0 have two separate pages. It would be like separate pages for Dawn to Dusk and Twilight to Starlight. --Dbenbenn 22:49, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Judas 0 was a limited edition release. It's not a given that every copy of Rotten Apples also contains Judas 0, as is the case with MCIS. Pumpkingrrl 07:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most limited edition bonus discs are put on the same page as what they were released with, but in this case, it seems like Judas 0 had enough of a life on its own. I wouldn't be against the combination, but I like the current separation. Folkor 16:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Example: Still (Nine Inch Nails album) -- Jon Dowland 13:32, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is true. Most limited edition bonus discs usually have either not many tracks on them, or are live recordings; alternate cuts; etc...

I consider this disc substantial enough to be it's own album. 125.238.16.70 00:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Judas 0, Judas O, Judas Ø...?[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:03, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Judas Ø → Judas O —

Judas O appears in typed form on the back of the CD case and in the CD insert booklet. Judas Ø only appears on the CD itself, in handwriting. Two (typed) uses to one (handwritten). Pasta of Muppets (talk) 00:41, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Does anyone have a definitive answer as to which variation is the correct one? Zero, O without Stroke, O with Stroke? -- Christopher C. Parker ^{t c} 19:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Names are not generally stylized but I think the name is Judas 0.--Labattblueboy (talk) 14:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It should be reiterated that the typed character in question is definitely the letter O ("oh") and not the digit 0 ("Zero"). It is almost perfectly rounded, far too round to be a narrower "zero" digit. Pasta of Muppets (talk) 06:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support per MOS:TM 70.29.210.242 (talk) 05:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Judas O. That spelling is used by Allmusic, as well as the article's only source. Jafeluv (talk) 09:41, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Fair use rationale for Image:Smashing Pumpkins Greatest Hits album cover.jpg[edit]

Image:Smashing Pumpkins Greatest Hits album cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]