This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This redirect is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
I think this is more or less OK now, so I will cast it adrift and let the world decide.
David91
There seems to be only one discussion page for "Open Skies" and "Open skies" It also seems as if Open Skies is more of a product advertisement than an article Kardous 16:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Can anyone clarify this sentence from the article? "To illustrate the scope of the Treaty, Germany and Italy have to accept 12 overflights per year, while Russia (including Belarus) and the United States must permit 42 overflights each." It's useful except for the puzzling part about Russia including Belarus, given that they're separate countries. Did Russia and Belarus somehow bargain collectively for a total of 42 overflights above the two countries combined? 153.31.113.20 (talk) 13:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
