Talk:Neal Horsley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If anything it's pro-Horsley biased[edit]

I recalled the incident where he told Alan Colmes he had sex with animals in his youth, and was looking for the reference. I was surprised to see the content of that dialog here had been toned down, and given an impression that Horsley was joking when he said it. That was not the impression that most people had when they heard the interview.

I just checked the wiki entry for Mohammed Atta and it has numerous references to terrorists. Why the white glove treatment with Horsley? He's no different.

Complaints of bias[edit]

Could this be any more biased? The President of Planned Parenthood herself must have written this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.77.73.78 (talk • contribs)

Well, anonymous user, why don't you contribute to a more neutral tone?Serodio 03:23, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What can you do with this entry?[edit]

It is highly speculative that it is. Definitely does not conform with NPOV, as it is used in a slandering manner to say the least, and adds nothing to the article.

  • Highly speculative? He admitted fucking a mule on national radio!

Shouldn't he change his name to "Kneel, Mulesy"?

Terrorism[edit]

I have removed allegations of terrorism and provided verifiable evidence of Horsley's activities. I have toned down the bestiality component considerably. Capitalistroadster 23:26, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

why?

Message from Neal Horsley[edit]

The content of this article is not only patently false on numerous details of fact (for example I was born in Bremen not Bowdon, Georgia; I was in the USAF, not the Army), but contains libel per se when it accuses me of advocating terrorism. I have on two occasions contacted Wikipedia and told them to remove the libelous statement. I have been ignored. It is a matter of public record that in the recent past, I spent over three years suing Planned Parenthood, NOW, and Geraldo Rivera when they libelously accused me of assassinating the abortionist Barnett Slepian. Even though I lost, it cost the various parties well over $1,000,000 to deal with the litigation. Wikipedia and the authors of the libelous statements on this "encyclopedia" should prepare to deal with the same process unless they retract the libelous accusation that I have advocated terrorism. I will give them (whether the "them" be Wikipedia staff or the lying author of the article about me) two weeks to get that statement out of this article. If it's still there in two weeks from March 27, 2006, I will initiate a defamation complaint in federal court.

Neal Horsley —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhorsley (talk • contribs)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It's been fixed, but in the future, you can fix it yourself, just go ahead and click the "edit" button. WP:AUTO comes into play most often when you start an article about yourself, not when you correct information that other people have written about you.  RasputinAXP  c 12:47, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You should be aware of our No Legal Threats policy. *Dan T.* 13:28, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There were some comments in the article, apparently by Mr. Horsley, disputing some of the article's statements. I've removed the comments from the article, along with the disputed statements, and placed them here:

At this time, Horsley had been studying Christian Reconstructionism and Dominion Theology[I, Neal Horsley, testify that the preceding sentence has no foundation in fact. My book Call It Revolution explains how I came to the strategy I represent today.].
While shut down by a 2002 decision of the 9th Circuit Court (Oregon) in a permanent injunction [I, Neal Horsley, testify that the preceding phrase is false. No injunction was obtained shutting the Nuremberg Files web site down. It was shut down by upstream internet service owners--longline telecos--who censored the Nuremberg Files without court order. The [1] Nuremberg Files is online today because no Court Order ever existed], it has reappeared more than once on other ISPs.
After Kopp was profiled on America's Most Wanted, Horsley posted on his website a "citizen's arrest warrant" for the show's host, John Walsh. [I, Neal Horsley, testify the preceding sentence is a lie.]

Jim E. Black 12:38, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't Neal Horsley ever take the time to learn proper editing and style guidelines? Not only does he edit his own biographic article (bad form), he fails to understand that discussions or disputes regarding an article actually go on the TALK page. Also Mr. Horsley this isn't a court of law, testifying is not necessary. --Sodium N4 12:10, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No a directory of webpages[edit]

Note: The following thread was moved from Talk:Nuremberg Files.

This is obviously not a directory of webpages so doesn't belong in the Category:Web_directories, so I have removed it. --AGoon 12:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Libelous- Point of View[edit]

I think this is an inflamatory article written by one of Mr. Horsley's ememies, perhaps someone who lost a legal battle or money $$ because of his views.

Perhaps an enemy like Planned Parenthood, an organization that slaughters American babies faster than Hitler could possibly imagine exterminating the Jews and more effeciently too.

Ideas in the USA of Succession are not Terrorism... Only in dictatorships, suppression of opposing points of view are encouraged.

This article is malicious and does not conform to NPOV....Steve N. cpusftwre@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.97.150.194 (talk • contribs)
  • Please edit it yourself to your liking as opposed to complaining about it. Talk pages are not soapboxes. Thank you. --Sodium N4 08:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've spent the last few hours researching Mr. Horsley and other aspects of the anti-abortion movement in the late 90's. This article is quite fair and well-sourced (at least as of July 10, 2007). I can well understand how it might make Mr. Horsley himself or his supporters uncomfortable, but I don't see anything NPOV or incorrect. --User: Nittacc 9:06, 10 July 2007 (GMT)

Terrorism[edit]

There has been a complaint about the use of the word "terrorism" in this article, so I've removed it. It's best to avoid this word in areas like this, because it's essentially meaningless except as a term of abuse. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:18, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


NPOV Content List[edit]

Please list the items here that are considered to be NPOV. There is alot of passionate, anonymous complaining on this talk page referring to libelous content and defamation, etc. There is a lack of neutrality tag on the article but no discussion here. Please respond here with sections that appear to be NPOV or unverifable, etc., and leave the claims of this page being written by Planned Parenthood off, and work towards writing a better article. PLEASE SIGN YOUR COMMENTS ALSO! with 4x ~ --Sodium N4 21:37, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To hopefully end the debate on whether Mr. Horsley actually admitted to bestiality on the Alan Colmes Show, I have replaced the cited source, Newshounds - which can definitely be accused of taking a point of view on the matter, and replaced it with the hardlink to FOX News's own media player, steaming the May 5th radio program where said comments were made. A reliable written transcript of this exchange would be very useful, but I have yet to find one from a reliable source (non-blog, non-activism site). --Sodium N4 22:13, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

Nuremberg Files is a 2 paragraph stub that would be far more useful, and suitable, as part of the general Neal Horsley article. --Sodium N4 22:28, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Bestiality[edit]

Why isn't this mentioned? http://www.newshounds.us/2005/05/06/bizarre_sex_habits_of_the_extreme_rightwing.php

134.53.50.8 (talk) 22:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well that link used to be cited here, but was removed because its extremely biased. So I replaced it with a link to the actual audio broadcast. The actual incident is mentioned in the first few lines of the 2nd paragraph in the Neal Horsley article. --Sodium N4 (talk) 09:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The mention is gone, here is a better source: http://www.exa miner.com/x-1765-Underground-Examiner~y2009m4d28-Georgia-Creationist-Party-Candidate-Neal-Horsley-runs-on-secessionist-platform

98.231.60.102 (talk) 21:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have restored the reference with a section on "Bestiality". It certainly ought to be mentioned in the article. HandsomeMrToad (talk) 05:07, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfC[edit]

Light bulb iconBAn RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 17:04, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Neal Horsley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neal Horsley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:06, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Neal_Horsley&oldid=1195164603"