Talk:Economy of Lithuania

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old talk[edit]

The contents of this article seems pretty outdated, by some 5 years or so. Lysy 19:30, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This is indeed true, but the fr:Wikipédia:Êconomie de la Lituanie is not in a much better position. I have tried to make the best of both. If someone is able to delve into this subject, which is really not in my realm of competence, I am sure everybody would like it. In any case, I stay on watch, so as to be able to translate any amelioration into French. Note that the French text (which I found as it was) is probably a bit better structured than the English one, and there should be something to be considered there.
Trassiorf 20:50, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

Okay, I have added a POV template to the page because it reads, frankly, like a press-release. Whether or not this was intentional, it is pretty obvious with phrasing such as:

  • Inflation in Lithuania is no longer a problem. Economic sentiment and confidence of all business activities have rebounded from a record low at the beginning of the year 2009 and suggest further improvements in the economy.
  • Lithuania attracts foreign investors not only because of small tax burden but also because of a skilled workforce, a well-developed infrastructure and a bigger domestic market than the other two Baltic states combined.
  • Lithuania has an ambitious plan to become a Northern European innovation centre by 2020. To reach this goal, it is putting its efforts into attracting FDI to added-value sectors, especially IT services, software development, and consulting services, as well as finance or logistics.
  • Lithuania has prepared an attractive environment for business start-ups
  • Lithuania takes the first position in the EU by the number of students in the country.
  • An excellent telecommunication infrastructure and a well-educated, multilingual workforce enable Lithuania to provide high quality business services worldwide.

There's more, but that's a pretty good set of examples, I feel. Now, I don't really have a whole lot of time to spend on this, so while I'll do what I can, that's not going to be a whole lot. Aero-Plex (talk) 20:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the style of this article suggests that it was probably copy-pasted from somewhere. Economy of Poland has the same problem. Nobody cares enough to fix it.Keverich2 (talk) 18:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Economy of Lithuania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:53, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:23, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]