Talk:Feminist Wicca
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Feminist Wicca)
was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was REDIRECT
- delete dictdef - and a poor one at that KeyStroke 03:01, 2004 Sep 13 (UTC)
- Keep. This seems like it could be a worthy substub, maybe should be merged with other articles about wicca instead of deleting.--Jpittman 03:25, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Redirect to Wicca, but don't merge the POV useless content.--Samuel J. Howard 04:22, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. No provenance of the usage is provided, so why bother to redirect? What's next, Feminist lunches rogue mid-day meals which exclude men? Fire Star 04:38, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Redirect to Dianic Wicca. The Dianic Wicca page mentions "Feminist Wicca" as one of its synonyms. Pyrop
- Delete: Criminy, folks. Is there non-feminist wicca? Wicca arose from the first wave feminist movement of the 1910's, after being sucked out of Madame Blavatsky. Redirect what to it? No dang content. We're not a thesaurus, and this stuff doesn't begin to reach the numbers necessary. Geogre 12:58, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Redirect to Dianic Wicca; this is an inaccurate substub. The data about the more militantly feminist side of Wicca is there. Smerdis of Tlön 17:00, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Redirect to Dianic Wicca which deals well with this topic. —Morven 19:04, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)
- Redirect to Dianic Wicca, the more accurate term (and better article). — Gwalla | Talk 02:30, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.