User talk:AndriuZ

Welcome to the Wikipedia[edit]

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Sam Spade 11:14, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category Theory[edit]

By all means, merge this material into Category theory and improve that article as you see fit. Gazpacho 09:48, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could You do this, please, ? because I cant see how to improve --AndriuZ 09:55, 2005 May 16 (UTC)

I'm afraid I can't, since I don't know A from B in category theory. Are you saying Category theory already covers the info? If so, you can justredirect the name. Gazpacho 09:59, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm saying that [[Category theory]] is dificult to understand. I created by mistake [[Category Theory]] because in my preview I saw no article, but now see_&_think, that short version is better, than extended :-/ Also I asked the author Mr. Joseph Goguen to contribute. Let's wait for a while? --AndriuZ 10:25, 2005 May 16 (UTC)

I believe Category theory is difficult to understand only because category theory is difficult to understand :) Gazpacho 07:30, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

yeee:))) we used to say long leave.. long learn.. anyway will die foolish or smth like that --AndriuZ 05:38, 2005 May 18 (UTC)

Lithuanian ISP block[edit]

Hi, I've had to block your ISP again because User:Zivinbudas is up to his old revert war tricks again (e.g. here and here)on Baltic pages, and there are now simply too many pages for me to protect them all. I will send you some email about a way for us to use to allow you to continue to edit. Sorry! Noel (talk) 19:43, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Glad to see you're still editing! I sent you some email... Noel (talk) 21:11, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Brainstorming[edit]

After looking at the user's other contributions: [1], it seemed like vanity content to me. For example, the user also created a foreign language page for Mauri Giovanni, and spammed a birthday entry for that person, despite the fact that google gets less than 292 hits for that term [2]. It was poorly written, placed in the wrong section, and seemed like vandalism to me so i reverted it; if you know for a fact that the band was notable, please, by all means, create an article for it. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 18:33, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

New Engineering Wiki[edit]

Engineering Wiki is a wiki entirely dedicated to collecting information about Engineering. I invite you to join this wiki. User:219.65.122.162

Thanks, I'll try

Bruce Barton[edit]

You did the article on Bruce Barton (advertising guru with BBDO). I am currently looking to contact his great-grandson Brad Barton. Brad was part of the founding group of the Arena Football League and I'm doing a research project on him. If you have any, ANY information as to how or where I can contact Brad I'd be very grateful!!! DOAsaturn 23:14, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of advertising[edit]

Sorry, I had to delete the placeholder in article space. There's nothing wrong with your working a subject up in your sandbox (quite the opposite) but if you want to get external input you're best taking it to the Village Pump or an appropriate WikiProject. Just zis Guy you know? 21:38, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok. But I think this is small page, I'll handle it to the some good look and put to the article, not worth to create more entities like WikiProject? But othervise it could be some project merging coresponding timelines to management issues? Undecided... --AndriuZ 22:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion thing[edit]

I put commons:Image:Small_Orange_XML_Button_for_RSS_Page.gif up for deletion. Just FYI. Ashibaka tock 01:45, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging[edit]

Greetings. From the description and use of Image:TRIZway.jpg, it appears you intended this media to be freely available. I took the liberty of applying a {{GFDL-presumed}} tag. Could you confirm this at by replacing my edit with {{GFDL-self}}? Regards, Dethomas 03:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, thanks --AndriuZ 14:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Post ante[edit]

Po Jūsų išėjimo iš lt.wi. gimtojoje enciklopedijoje atsirado naujų "kūrėjų", kurių veiklą Vikipedijoje gerai paanalizavus, gali susidaryti įspūdis, kad "pažeidimai", dėl kurių įvyko "iškilmingas" blokavimas po Jums "iškilmingai" (tačiau garbės administruojantiems nedarančių) įteiktų įspėjimų ( turbūt arogantiška forma), gerokai nublanksta lyginant su post ante įvykiais, sukrėtusiais gležną ir jauną baltiškosios kultūros enciklopediją. Įvykiais, sietais su kuo tik nori - kgb, spec tarn., GRU ir baigiant donskininkais bei socialistais.

Tikėtina, kad veiksmai Jūsų atžvilgiu nebuvo suprasti kaip (negatyvus) asmeninės iniciatyvos sankcionavimas, neproporcingai taikytas, ignoruojant teigiamą indėlį ir nemąstant apie tolesnę Vikipedijos ateitį. Viskam ateina savas laikas... Todėl administravimo kultūra turi greičiau "augti", bet tas augimas negalimas be kritiško paskatinimo iš išorės (ko dar, galima sakyti, iki šiol trūksta po kai kurių dalyvių pasitraukimo). Tad nereikėtų užverti atvirų durų ten, kur tiek daug kurta ir kur buvo sėkmingai sudėti pamatai ištisoms mokslo šakoms (IT, menas, psi ir kt.). 21:39, 29 March 2006 --Veneto

ačiū, bet nelabai supratau - jie mane pranoko ar ne? reikia grįžti ir "įvesti tvarką" ? :-))) --AndriuZ 22:51, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Šiokia tokia "tvarka" jau yra. Apie kultūrą čia visai kita kalba. Pasiskaityti retkarčiais tai tikrai įdomu. --Veneto 12:04, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan Brandenburg AfD[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you've contributed quite a bit to the topic of Visualization (graphic) and was wondering if you might have some constructive thoughts on this AfD nomination which relates to visualization. Any comments are welcome. Thanks and sorry if this is a bother. Dall ben 07:39, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hidden Champions[edit]

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Hidden Champions, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Hidden Champions. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. TheRingess 21:08, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of E-NRICH[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on E-NRICH, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because E-NRICH seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting E-NRICH, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SPIN (sales)[edit]

A tag has been placed on SPIN (sales), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. A ecis^Brievenbus 13:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Klas Mellander[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Klas Mellander, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. B. Wolterding 09:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:TRIZ3approaches.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:TRIZ3approaches.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 07:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Triz[edit]

The article Triz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Scott Mac (Doc) 14:37, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of OpenI[edit]

I have nominated OpenI, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenI. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 18:31, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello AndriuZ! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 971 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Constantinos C. Markides - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Maildrop[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Maildrop, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.courier-mta.org/maildrop/, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Maildrop and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Maildrop, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Maildrop with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Maildrop. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Maildrop saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! —Cliffb (talk) 08:26, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timeline of management techniques for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of management techniques is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of management techniques until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 08:09, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Creative Education Foundation[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Creative Education Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DGG ( talk ) 23:25, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of IDAMS[edit]

The article IDAMS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing in this unreferenced article to demonstrate notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Illia Connell (talk) 05:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TRIZway.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TRIZway.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:48, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

agree to delete, file is outdated --AndriuZ (talk) 12:43, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ideal final result for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ideal final result is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideal final result until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. aprock (talk) 07:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of IDAMS for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IDAMS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IDAMS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:57, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, AndriuZ. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sciencecategories[edit]

Template:Sciencecategories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DrKay (talk) 21:42, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, AndriuZ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marci Segal for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marci Segal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marci Segal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:43, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, AndriuZ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, AndriuZ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of IDIS (software)[edit]

The article IDIS (software) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:TRIZway.jpg[edit]

The file File:TRIZway.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:TRIZway.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:TRIZway.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TRIZway.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:19, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]