Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AlexBeckersMikeKrol

This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of the pages entitled Josh Mirman and Stubble comic.

This page is kept as an historic record.

The result of the debate was deletion.

Doubts about inclusion/notability: these two and the two above are uploaded by the one anon Special:Contributions/24.185.223.210, all about college undergrads, which makes it all look like a vanity/friends of vanity attempt. Dysprosia 07:25, 10 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Also Ian J. --Stormie 06:04, May 10, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Removed "STORMIE SUCKS!" comment from the Mike Krol page. jaredwf 07:24, 10 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
- I got insulted in an article? I've hit the big time! :-) --Stormie 09:30, May 10, 2004 (UTC)
Delete, even though Mike Krol lives to design, but dies to rock. john 08:59, 10 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. -- Chris 73 | Talk 11:36, 10 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Jeez, all that non-notability and they attempt to insult a Wikipedian in good standing? Delete both as vanity and as incapable of creating an insult above the fourth-grade level. - Lucky 6.9 15:08, 10 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not entirely certain why this page was added, but if it matters to the debate I could also be linked from the Asheron's Call page. I currently work at Turbine Entertainment Software and am the Online Community Relations rep for Asheron's Call. This is probably too trivial for the WikiPedia, but that's not my decision to make. -- Cspariah, 17:15, 10 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for bringing it to my attention; I've de-wikispammed it. Oh and delete the other two pages. Alcarillo 19:25, 10 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both: vanity, nonnotable. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:47, 12 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate up to the point of deletion and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the new method of assessing voting, should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.