Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danth's Law

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:33, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Danth's Law[edit]

Neologism. --W(t) 02:15, 2005 May 28 (UTC)

Delete: Legend of the ether. Neologism for a law that is no law and a phenomenon that isn't constricted to the phone wires. Geogre 03:32, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All google hits are wikipedia mirrors. DoubleBlue (Talk) 03:41, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable phrase. Megan1967 04:58, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and inform those responsible that we have won the argument. — Phil Welch 05:34, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Appears to be neologism. Currently cannon find any third party references to verify that it is noteworthy. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:36, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Immediately recognizable on Tangency forums of RPG.NET, which has approximately 20,000 users, but can't be viewed from Google (as Google isn't 'signed in'). Anything used or recognized in the thousands is notable enough to keep. Almafeta 07:01, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete neologism. JamesBurns 11:23, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:NOR. R adiant _* 11:31, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Frjwoolley 02:07, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Stoopid.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.