Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarrah sastrawan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jarrah sastrawan[edit]

Jarrah sastrawan was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete.

Wow. How Gretchen Wieners is this? "I can't help it that I'm popular." We can, however, delete this. I guess we're juss jellus. Mike H 08:38, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete. Why hasn't it been deleted already? Jeff Knaggs 08:42, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Jarrah is a great guy, and once he becomes internationally famous (or infamous) you'll all be sorry. keep the page, what is the problem with it?

  • He's not famous and this is vanity; that's the problem. Mike H 08:46, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)
  • sighs* There are plenty of pages which are even worse than this. Why don't you divert your attention to them? I vote that this is kept as a page.
  • I didn't actually create this site, it was Ashish, or David, but I think it's against Wikipedia policy to have random things like this. If I get rid of the random stuff, will you let me keep it? [[User: Sastrawan] 08:46, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)
  • Hmmm......it would seem Jarrah hasn't heard of a personal page.
  • I've deleted the content. Feel free to delete the site as well, Mike H. I did not put it up, nor do I want it up. -- Sastrawan
  • S-P-E-E-D-Y D-E-L-E-T-E. And make that extremely. Thank you. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 09:27, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.