Talk:United States Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Veterans' vs. Veterans[edit]

Shouldn't this be at United States Secretary of Veterans' Affairs? -- Zoe yeah whammy!!!!!!!!

Not according to the website. - Hephaestos
The rules of grammar suggest the version with the apostrophe would be correct, but the legislation creating the Department uses both spellings. The Department seems to use mostly the "no-apostrophe" version. But if the legislators won't be consistent, we shouldn't go crazy trying to.
LOL. Good point. There are enough other things to drive me crazy.  :) - Zoe

Revisited[edit]

It really jars with me to access a page called "United States Secretary of Veterans Affairs", but find the first words of the article are "United States Secretary of Veterans' Affairs ...".

Can we at least choose one version and stick with it? -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 21:50, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion[edit]

I think it's ridiculous that all other cabinet secretaries get extremely long articles while this one is a bit more than a stub. I wish I knew more about the American government so I could expand this myself... oh well. -- Rune Welsh ταλκ 12:51, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely agree, this article needs expanding. If nothing else, when was the Line of Sucession amended to include the new Secretary? (because, for instance, the Secretary of Homeland Security, created by W., is NOT in the line yet) Staxringold 10:54, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Amongst other edits, I removed some refs in the table. I this sort of information needn't be justified unless there is some actual reason for doubt. I note that one ref suggested a difference between different tables, but that seems to have to do with one chart not listing an end of term acting secretary. If anyone wants me to rebuild any of the refs, just let me know. I removed different parts over a series of edits, so I recognize I should be responsible for doing it. -Rrius (talk) 00:14, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was the one who added the note and broke out the acting guys into a different table. I did this to mimic the listing at United States Secretary of the Treasury and a previous version of the State Department page. As for the references in the dates, these were added to make the article more reliable. As for the dispute: you are referring to Herschel Gober's stint in 2000-01. Different sources list him, others don't. I was just highlighting the contradictions. In hindsight, that was better for a talk page than the article. Thanks for your input; it what makes us great! - Thanks, Hoshie 10:02, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Illnesses that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs determines associated with the Gulf War...[edit]

I would like to know what the Secretary of Veterans Affairs considers a compensateable illness, diagnosed or undiagnosed for the veterans of the Gulf War? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.18.118.105 (talk) 18:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States Secretary of Veterans Affairs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:03, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]