Talk:Phantom energy

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Cosmology Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Cosmology task force.

Stub[edit]

Instead of deleting this, we should just replace it with a stub. The actual concept of phantom energy exists (see the pages which link to it for explanation), this would probably better be classified as vandalism. EagleFalconn 19:26, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

looping Universe theory: Phantom energy Big Bang[edit]

Nothingness cannot rip off; thus during the Planckian Rip, a new universe will emerge.
An old theory. We should mention all theories.

Is big bang the rip off of nothingness? Certainly not because: a. we have work and potential, b. quantum physics is in effect. That is certainly not nothingness. Nothing cannot exist (because if it did it would be something; which is different).

Serious physicists how focus on data, say that the Universa will thermally die a permanent final non-Big-Banging death. (holy mother of turd; and universe was fun...😢) On the other hand, we then have to physically define spatiotemporal or metalogically deeper QFT state permanence 😜 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4119:B900:41CC:8AFB:EA8F:116B (talk) 05:39, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]