Talk:Bharatiya Janata Party

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bharatiya Janata Party article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: 30 days

Bharatiya Janata Party has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 1, 2015. (Reviewed version).

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Bharatiya Janata Party. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Bharatiya Janata Party at the Reference desk.

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India: History / Politics High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article was last assessed in December 2014.

Politics: Political parties Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Conservatism High‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discrimination Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Hinduism Mid‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors on 15:07, 25 December 2014 (UTC).Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

	This article has been selected as the WikiProject Political parties Collaboration of the Month for June 2010!
	Please read the collaboration and assessment pages and help improve this article to a good article or even a featured article standard.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

A fact from Bharatiya Janata Party appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 July 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Bharatiya Janata Party won a majority in the 2014 Indian parliamentary election, the first time any political party had done so since 1984?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bharatiya Janata Party.

Wikipedia

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 March 2024[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Request to remove the below lines as I couldn't find the cited resources and this is an allegation not a actual fact. 'India has experienced nationwide democratic backsliding under the BJP's rule since 2014.[45][46]" or add the reliable resource to verify the authenticity of the statement. 188.147.73.23 (talk) 22:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have put citation [52] into a citation template and added page numbers. That should solve your problem.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

misguiding infromation about ideology[edit]

this page is misnformed, someone add the islamophobia as bjp's ideology it is ultra fake, because In bjp Constitution says "sarva dharma sama bhavana " all relgions are equal. so pls remove this misguiding information. Gourindian (talk) 02:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gourindian: Any material added to Wikipedia must have been published previously by a reliable source. Editors may not add content solely because they believe it is true, nor delete content they believe to be untrue, unless they have verified beforehand with a reliable source.^{Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth} There are many citations provided to support the statement that the Bharatiya Janata Party's ideology is Islamophobic.

We could delete the statements saying that Bharatiya Janata Party's ideology is Islamophobic, if you could show that the citations did not say that.
We could could add equivocating statements, if you could provide citations that support your claim that it is not Islamophobic. Your interpretation of the BJP's constitution does not count. You need reliable secondary sources.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, all of the cited sources are either opinion pieces, or are stating Islamic stories such as Prophet Muhammad married Aisha at the age of 6 and completed the marriage by having sex with her when Aisha was 9 years old. It's available in Wikipedia itself. That does not come in Islamophobia.

Here is a Muslim leader of BJP talking about secularism and it's importance for BJP: https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/secularism-constitutional-moral-commitment-for-bjp-mukhtar-abbas-naqvi/articleshow/87238320.cms 49.35.211.237 (talk) 11:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I've reviewed all the citations - all of which - a couple WP:NEWSOPED - don't support the "ideology of the BJP" — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 18:10, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

allegations over attempted control over independent democratic institutions[edit]

Over the course of their two consecutive terms, there have been many allegations over alleged attempts over control over ED , SC,electoral commission, in a wider list, even media can be included. Harveyspecter210 (talk) 05:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox parameters[edit]

Two infobox parameter errors → Page using Template:Infobox Indian political party with unknown parameter "farmers" — plus — Page using Template:Infobox Indian political party with unknown parameter "national_convener".

Suggestion — Maybe that content can be incorporated into the body of the article. Isaidnoway (talk) 20:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Critics have pointed out that BJP is hardly Right wing economically. (Requested edit since the page is protected)[edit]

Critics have pointed out BJP is in general (mostly) a mixture of conservative social policies, with quite a bunch of left leaning economic policies; the article in misleading in that sense since BJP is mostly opportunistic/pragmatic/populist mixtures than idealistic purity in economics. I would like someone who has the access to this page to actually edit it. These are few of the citations: 1 2 3 4 Averagepcuser (talk) 16:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those sources are all opinion pieces; per ~~WP:OPED~~ WP:NEWSORG, they don't carry much weight. We need scholarly sources making the same argument. Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks! I couldn't find many scholarly sources, I will keep that in mind for my next contribution. I am guessing they(the scholars) might be using the label right-left economic policies in a different way than categorically sorting out policies one by one, but more in the line with typicality of a party belonging to the category relative to others and their historical branding. If this guess of mine is true if BJP was non-hindu secular party on social policies it would be classified as centre to centre-left by the scholars. (I think I should look more into how scholars use this criteria by resisting the human urge of falling into word essentialism) Averagepcuser (talk) 07:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a considerable body of literature showing that the BJP's economic policy has focused on deregulation, which is not a leftist priority. It has undeniably mixed in populist priorities, which we cover; but calling them "leftist" is not something we can do without reliable sources supporting that terminology. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]