Talk:Prince Edward of Saxe-Weimar

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Military / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Military history: Biography / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Untitled[edit]

A few questions: What is meant by "honourary peerage"? It doesn't really make sense. Was he really on the Privy Council, and if so, why is he not in our list of historical members? I have (I hope) clarified some matters regarding his wife. -- Nunh-huh 00:43, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)

This page has no references sited. Might be a good idea to site some or remove the article altogether. -- Prince Stephen 19:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both points now resolved. Dormskirk (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Prince Edward of Saxe-Weimar. Favonian (talk) 15:42, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Edward of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach → Prince Edward of Saxe-Weimar – WP:COMMONNAME. He is principally notable as a British military officer, and in British sources he is most commonly known as "Prince Edward of Saxe-Weimar". See examples from the London Gazette (the official paper of record) in 1846, 1864, 1887, 1898... there are lots more. Opera hat (talk) 00:41, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support those cites confirm what I recall: he's best known (at least in English) without the "Eisenach". In fact, I think that's true for all his dynasty, even those who weren't domiciled in the UK. FactStraight (talk) 01:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I agree with your first statement but not your second statement.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 04:59, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support There's 183 post-1980 Google Book hits for "Prince Edward of Saxe-Weimar". Adding "-Eisenach" cuts it to 178. Here is his obit in the New York Times. His father's title is given as "Duke of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach", but there is no suggestion that this is his name. Kauffner (talk) 05:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Proposed title appears to be the clear common name, as shown by the above evidence. Jenks24 (talk) 06:36, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.