User talk:Ocohen

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your picture for Harrow Footbal, it really adds to the article. --Apyule 12:40, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Houses of Harrow School[edit]

I noticed that the Rendalls House and Bradbys House articles were deleted and turned into redirects (a peculiarly savage and unnecessary act, as a simple redirect would have been enough).

I've started a new article (title above). Feel free to help me to expand it.

If you add information, could you please say what your source is? For instance a lot of the information in Rendalls House, such as the list of House Masters, should have a published source. Other information, such as the famous former members, is listed on the Harrow School website on the page for the history of that House. If you'd like me to put a copy of your deleted work into your user space for reference purposes (which I can do as an administrator) please ask. --Tony Sidaway ^Talk 04:06, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Houses of Harrow School[edit]

In all fairness, all public schools have houses, and the article as it stands shows no evidence of the "encyclopaedic" information of which you speak. As of right now, it is only a list of houses, with scant facts about them (name, colours, master), making it effectively a series of entries for a directory, which, according to policy, Wikipedia is not. I might suggest that your opinion of this information may be somewhat biased, you being at Harrow itself. In general, vanity writing, including writing about one's own friends, family, school, etc. is discouraged, as the results are more often . Kudos for your work on the article on Harrow School, but it is my opinion that an article on the houses is not for us, an opinion supported by current policy. I might suggest trying your hand at some other articles for a while (one of the beauties of Wikipedia is that you really never know what you'll find next). You could try browsing the lists of new pages or recent changes for some ideas, or perhaps some of the lists at WP:MEA which need sorting. If you're feeling particularly adventurous, look at a few random pages and see if something turns up you can add to. Maintenance tasks such as copyediting, wikifying and adding context to new articles are as important (if not moreso) than actually adding new information to articles, since they make our existing body of information accessible to a broader userbase.

I'm not trying to be mean, honest :o), but I'd encourage you to try exploring the big wide world of Wikipedia and its numerous sister projects . I started out with some edits to stubs about my local area, and a year on, my braglist extends to documentary films, UK taxation, and a lot of minor edits (I see spelling errors on other websites and find myself reaching for a non-existent "edit" button to fix them :-o). Widen your scope a little at a time, you really won't regret it.

Happy editing, and may your career here be long and as close to "happy" as WP will reasonably allow ;-) Chris talk back 18:58, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for all your work on the Harrow School article, I found it very interesting reading. Puchu 12:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image[edit]

An image you uploaded, Image:Elstreeschoolcrest.gif, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 14:03, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Elstreeschoolcrest.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Elstreeschoolcrest.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:52, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Harrow Crest.JPG[edit]

Hello, Ocohen. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Harrow Crest.JPG) was found at the following location: User:Ocohen. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Harrow Crest.JPG[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Harrow Crest.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MHDIV ɪŋglɪʃnɜː(r)d(Suggestion?|wanna chat?) 19:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Debralogo.gif[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Debralogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harrow[edit]

Hey Oli, I realise you're a Harrovian and seem very passionate about your school. I'm an old Harrovian and am at the moment collating resources to try and make the article as comprehensive and thorough as possible. Harrow's a great place, but it is very quirky, I think it makes a really interesting addition to the encyclopedia, so much history and so many traditions. Just thought I'd let you know I'm working on getting it featured; unfortunately my library is going to take up to eight weeks to get the resources. Good luck with your studies, you're working with the best teachers so you should do really well --Hadseys (talk • contribs) 20:55, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Oli, thanks for the reply, if you wanna help out with the article, you could write a section on the Harrow association, and if you live near the Vaughan library you might be able to find some useful resources there, other than that I'll do the majority of the work and if you want you can do a copyedit --Hadseys (talk • contribs) 00:20, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Orchid Trust[edit]

The article Orchid Trust has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No WP:Independent sources found in quick search; probably does not meet WP:ORG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:26, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:RendallsDrillSquad.jpg[edit]

The file File:RendallsDrillSquad.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kelly ^hi! 18:58, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]