Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Wolden

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Brian Wolden[edit]

Tagged as a speedy, but doesn't fit my interpretation of the criteria. vanity. non-notable. Can't believe we have to vote on things like this. Joyous 19:53, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete. Agree that it is not speedy. — David Remahl 19:58, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. I often nominate such articles as speedys and they get deleted 90% of the time. David Johnson 20:23, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. It was not written by the subject of the article, but rather is a genuine attempt to inform and document information about an important person.Ariana 20:59, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
He's starred in a few independent films (none of which were popular or even slightly well-known according to Google), is a student and tutor who is interested in sandwiches. Sorry, that doesn't fit with my definition of "important". David Johnson 23:24, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable. --fvw* 21:20, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable Dsmdgold 21:31, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)

Brian is a figure of great interest to me. I vote it stays.

We appreciate your opinion, but you need to be logged in if you want your vote to be counted. Joyous 00:55, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: Not sufficiently notable. Geogre 01:41, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. No that notable. --Calton 02:58, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Just not. --Tagishsimon (talk) 03:00, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. I know the author, and the subject, and they are wankers. --68.111.33.38 08:00, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • an important "hacky-sacker" must stay... or maybe delete Mozzerati 00:10, 2004 Nov 29 (UTC)
  • No IMSB entry, don't know the films. delete. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 11:16, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 19:31, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Whoa. Vanity plus a photo? Delete for certain and consider moving info to user page. - Lucky 6.9 22:20, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
    • Comment: User:Arpiana is a sockpuppet. All edits are to the article and to this discussion. He/she is also responsible for the photo. - Lucky 6.9 22:22, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete --RoySmith 3 July 2005 20:25 (UTC)