Talk:Elizabeth Proctor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ecollotta.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

It should be "Proctor"; I've fixed this. BTW, there are a number of Crucible-related articles that could use the spoiler warning if you feel so inclined. — Deh 19:20, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
There is dispute about the "correct" spelling of the name. The majority of the primary source documents spelled the name "Procter" not "Proctor," although the latter spelling has become the default modern spelling of the name, as used by Miller.It really depends on whether this article is supposed to be about the actual person or the fictional character based loosely on her. Ogram 01:50, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I changed some wording here and there, and corrected some spelling errors. Hopefully will be back later to add content. — Clocktowerkiss 20:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability & Accuracy[edit]

I'd really like to see more citations of sources in this article. I know there's a list of references at the bottom, for instance, I'd like to know exactly where the references to Ann (Holland) Bassett Burt's witchcraft case from 1669 came from. Ogram 01:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with this article[edit]

The article seems to focus too much on the general events of the Salem With-Hunt Trials rather than the events and information that relate to Elizabeth Proctor herself. Ought to clean it up. Saphius (talk) 03:28, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was my understanding from a visit to Salem that Mary Warren accused Elizabeth Proctor, then recanted (attributed in this article to one of the other girls) but was then threatened by the three original girls that Mary would be the next accused of witchcraft unless she again accused Elizabeth Proctor. Fearing for her own life, Mary then once again accused Elizabeth Proctor of witchcraft leading to her conviction and imprisonment.64.191.211.55 (talk) 19:57, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bad wording[edit]

"it was now widely accepted that innocent people had been wrongly convicted" — This needs reworking — does it mean "by this time it was widely accepted that the accused/executed had been wrongly convicted." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.92.83.106 (talk) 18:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction[edit]

This article says: "In January 1693, several hundred people were still in prison awaiting trial. On January 27, while still in prison, Elizabeth gave birth to a daughter whom she named Lexi after her mother." The John Proctor article says: "In January 1693, while still in jail, Elizabeth (Bassett) Proctor gave birth to a son, John Proctor III."

Does anyone know which it was? Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 21:23, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elizabeth Proctor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]