Talk:Halsbury's Laws of England

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Halsbury's First Edition[edit]

Since this 31 volume set was published in 1907, it should now be copyright free on the same basis that the 1911 Britannica is. I own a full set. Any suggestions about how it might get scanned and whether it would be worth doing are invited.

--KenWalker | Talk 08:28, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should do this. Perhaps talk to Google since they are scanning large numbers of books? Richard W.M. Jones 23:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Untag[edit]

Given that the article is about Halsbury's Laws, a major innovation in the resources made available at the time, the brief account of the first edition in the History section is not "an excessive amount of intricate detail", and the tag should be removed. Qexigator (talk) 23:17, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Halsbury's Laws of England. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]