User talk:Strannik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to the Wikipedia[edit]

Welcome, newcomer!

Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:


Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.

You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.

Best of luck, and have fun!

ClockworkTroll 03:39, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Article case sensitivity[edit]

Hi, Strannik, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for your work on Marvel Age. You might want to know that articles titles (and links to them) on Wikipedia are case-sensitive, except for the first letter of the first word. Therefore "Runaways (Comics)" would not point to the same article as "Runaways (comics)" (the latter is correct). —Lowellian (talk)[[]] 12:55, Oct 27, 2004 (UTC)

Image for deletion[edit]

Hi Strannik, I put an image you uploaded, Image:Runpromo.jpg, up for deletion because I uploaded a better quality version of it as Image:Marvel_Runaways.jpg. Fritz S. 14:49, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)

Runaways[edit]

Is it really necessary to have every other word wikified in the parents' descriptions from the Runaways comic page? Or haven't you noticed the anonymous user who created the page has a tendency to wikify rather indiscriminately? "New Age", for example, is wikified twice in the same article. --Pc13 21:19, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Well, maybe not every other word. I mean, I think common sense words such as "businesspeople" and "hollywood actors" can be safely dewikified. Terms like "New Age", which are less common and not nearly as self-explanitory as one might think, should stay wikified. Cultural references should definitely stay wikified.

P.S. Pardon my half-arsed spelling. As you probably noticed, it's not really my forte --Strannik 01:58, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Thanks for making the ROM-Turbo-Torpedo connection, which I was unaware of. However, the present ROM article makes no mention of Turbo or Torpedo (though this site lists Torpedo as "Rom's Greatest Ally"), and we currently lack an article for Turbo (comics). Do you think you could work on either or both of those, if you're fairly well-informed on the subjects? PS: as Runaways is an American comic, the American spelling of "armor" is appropriate (see WP style guide). -leigh (φθόγγος) 19:34, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
    • Actually, I got that info from the site you mentioned. I stumbled upon it while searching for Turbo info. But, if you need to, I'd be more then happy to help you with the Turbo aticle. Actually, how about we call it Torpedo (comics, since much of the backstory took place before Mickey and her friend got the armor and used it to establish a Turbo identity. --Strannik 00:28, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Disquiet (book)[edit]

Hello, fellow expat! I just wanted to ask if you've read the novel Disquiet by Strugatsky brothers? Because I have not, so I can write nothing about it... If you can write anything about it (even if that's gonna be a stub), do it please. That's the last article about the Noon Universe novels... --Koveras 13:17, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please contact us[edit]

Hello Strannik! we are a company working on an international commercial website about the movies Night Watch and Day Watch. We're looking for people who have a very good knowledge of the film's universe and the books they are based upon. If you are interested in participating as author or editor, Please write to nightwatch.site@googlemail.com Thanks!

Kirill Yeskov[edit]

Hi, Strannik, can you add more data on this guy's bio and/or books? Thanks, Ghirla | talk 13:33, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nope. Sorry. I have no idea who that guy is. I can look it up, of course (knowing Russian helps ;) ) --Strannik 03:52, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to P:RUS![edit]

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russia Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! Alex Bakharev 09:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FSU Metro Project[edit]

WRT to your contributions on Saint Petersburg Metro, perhaps this might interest you...--Kuban Cossack 14:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MThis user is a participant in the Soviet Metro wikiproject.

It's ready...please join! --Kuban Cossack 14:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted/Bomb Queen[edit]

Hello there. Just out of curiosity, do you have a source for the author claiming that the cover was not done with 'Wanted' in mind? Jayunderscorezero 10:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • One of the Bomb Queen threads in the Shadowline sub-section of Image Comics official forum. He was discussing his own changes to Bomb Queen wikipedia article and mentioned, in the same breath, that Wikipedia was wrong in that regard. I'll look it up later today, when I don't have a class to rush to.--Strannik 14:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grazhdansky Prospekt[edit]

Вы вернули в статью Grazhdansky Prospekt предложение про то, что это одна из восьми станций с банкоматами в вестибюле (изменив все-таки "восемь" на "немногие"). Во-первых, на мой взгляд, эта информация неэнцеклопедична, это все равно что про каждую станцию говорить, есть ли там скамейки или газетный киоск. Но это, конечно, спорно. А во-вторых, что более важно, эта информация очевидно неверна. Не в том смысле, что на станции "Гражданский проспект" нет банкомата, а в том, что это вовсе не "одна из немногих" таких станций. Я живу в Петербурге и могу с уверенностью заявить, что банкоматы есть почти на всех станциях, за редким, пожалуй, исключением. Geevee (talk) 07:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Виноват. Я только что сообразил что я перепутал банкоматы с автоматоми для продажи жетонов, которые, когда я был в Питере последний раз, действительно были редкостью. С тех пор правда многое изменилось. My apologies --Strannik 18:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Извинения принимаются :) А если не секрет, когда вы были в Питере? Кстати, а сами вы откуда? Geevee (talk) 19:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Я родился в Питере. Моя семья переехала в США примерно десять лет назад (восновнои потому что мои родители не могли найти работу по спецальности). С тех пор я несколько раз ездил в Питер, в основном во время каникул. Последний раз я там быд в прощлом году, во время весенних каникул.--Strannik 21:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Superpowers[edit]

Your information is great, but it really can't be written like a press release. (Phrase like "slated to appear," etc.). I'd like to recommend the more encyclopedic tone of the following:

The publisher Dynamite Entertainment said in 2007 that Daredevil would be one several public domain Golden Age characters that would appear in the comic-book series Superpowers, by writer Jim Krueger and artist Alex Ross[1]

Thanks. --Tenebrae 01:26, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Superpowers (comics). Thanks for doing the spadework. If you are interested there are similar projects with public domain characters in the works: The Next Issue Project [1] and The Twelve [2] which look like they'll need some work tracking down the right characters, starting some entries to fill in gaps, etc. and some of the characters are the same so there is quite a bit of crossover. If you are interested. (Emperor 22:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Cheers. Good work. (Emperor 19:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Not sure if you are interested but this might be up your alley [3]. It might be worth a few paragraphs on public domain characters and the re-appearance of them in different forms (with the sheer number of projects recently - I have another quote around somewhere on this last point) (Emperor 03:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

My apology[edit]

I'm sorry that I misconstrued your edits, which I must say read very hype-y and promotionally to me, as indicating that you were affiliated with the publisher of The Next Issue Project. I made an assumption, and, taking you at your word, I was wrong and I apologize. Thanks for being understanding and for communicating. --Tenebrae 23:58, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Apology accepted. Besides, I was a little pig-headed when it came to my edits. --Strannik 00:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Valilogo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Valilogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Magnus0.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Magnus0.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Downtown Swift Station Rendering.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Downtown Swift Station Rendering.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:NICTD Hudson Lake.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:NICTD Hudson Lake.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 02:20, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Staunton articles[edit]

Excellent work on the articles related to Staunton, Virginia. Please, however, be careful about your spelling/typing. I did have to fix a number of spelling/typographical errors on your recent edits. Thanks! SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:37, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry about that. I'll be more careful next time. --Strannik (talk) 00:05, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Our Neighborhood Times, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabloid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Valiant Comics (1990s emblem).jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Valiant Comics (1990s emblem).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Strannik. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Strannik. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Our Neighborhood Times[edit]

Notice

The article Our Neighborhood Times has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, website doesn't even work

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:32, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Geomancers (comics)[edit]

Notice

The article Geomancers (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fancruft; no indication of out-of-universe notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 01:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rocket (comics)[edit]

Notice

The article Rocket (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:22, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rocket (comics) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rocket (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocket (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:28, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Newsarama.com (July 18, 2007): "Ross and Krueger on Superpowers", by Matt Brady
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Strannik&oldid=1124096649"