Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three Rings Design

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 19:30, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

Three Rings Design

Advertising. Vanity. RickK 06:57, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)

• There is nothing in the article to indicate the company is notable. Delete --Smithfarm 11:27, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete advertising CDC (talk) 16:54, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete without third-party verifiability - David Gerard 19:35, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. It needs heavy cleanup to remove the "comes to us" first-person type stuff -- in fact, most or all of the individual staff descriptions could be eliminated. Nevertheless, an article about a company isn't thereby advertising. Maybe I'm biased because a friend of mine plays this company's Puzzle Pirates game, but, in general, I think Wikipedia should cover corporations, at least those that interact with the public and aren't purely local and minor. JamesMLane 08:13, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Advertisement for non-notable company. Fawcett5 22:40, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• I know I might be late but: Keep. AFAIK, Yohoho! Puzzle Pirates was quite a success, especially considering they were an indie developer. The article needs work though. Mrwojo 19:54, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.