Talk:National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:NIT Tiruchi)

Opening heading[edit]

Made the following changes to Student Life section:

  • Converted the club list to multi-column layout
  • Removed NITT suffix from club names (unnecessary repetition)
  • Arranged the clubs in alphabetical order

Casablanca2000in (talk) 07:18, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:13, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]



National Institute of Technology,TiruchirappalliNational Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli — There needs to be a space after the comma. (The new title already exists and is a redirect to the current page) The page has already been renamed several times by removing and adding commas, but there has been no consensus on a correct title. The punctuation is inconsistent within the official website itself as well as with other sources such as this newspaper article. I propose to keep the comma since it serves to separate the name of the institution from its location. Casablanca2000in (talk) 17:46, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. I reproduce below the reasons that I gave here for category renaming of National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli alumni to National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli alumni.
At first, I just wanted to correct the spelling errors in 'Institute' and 'Tiruchirappalli' but later i thought a comma might be appropriate. I did change the head article title to introduce a comma but another editor reasoned in the edit summary that the official webpage didn't display a comma and changed it back. However, I still think a comma is necessary due to the following:
1. It is a National Institute of Technology located at Tiruchirappalli and its name is just National Institute of Technology. The city name is only necessary to differentiate this institue from other National Institutes of Technology located at various other cities. Also please note that other Institutes of National Importance like the Indian Institutes of Technology have the city name as a integral part of the institue name like IITD, IITM etc. But this is not the case for the NITs.
2. Here's the Act of Parliament that recognized NITs as Institutes of National Importance. It clearly mentions the correct name of all the NITs including the comma.[1]
3. The official webpage is maintained by a webteam made of 3rd and 4th year students[2] and although I am sure that they provide accurate info on the website, a missing comma or punctuation wont be a high priority. In this regard it is better to go by the official communication put out by the administration of the institute like tender advts., recruitment notices etc. like here.[3]and[4]
4. One more important pointer to the exact name of the institute is the official contact address provided by it. It makes it clear whether the institute name includes the city name or not. As can be seen here,[5], it mentions the city name seperately from the institute name viz. Natioanal Institute of Technology. In contrast see IITD address here,[6] where they mention the institute name viz. IITD and then mention the city name, New Delhi seperately.
5. I also propose that the names of cities be removed entirely from some NITs wikipage titles that have been named after eminent persons like Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad, Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat for the reason that the names of all these institutes are already unique and dont need the city name to further identify/differentiate them.
Further, once a consensus on the name is reached i propose a speedy rename of category names too. [7], [8].-Mgtm7m (talk) 19:14, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Well reasoned argument. No need to add anything. Skinsmoke (talk) 03:43, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment wouldn't correcting a comma missing a space, just be a speedy move? 70.29.208.247 (talk) 03:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Excellent Work[edit]

This article is very well written! My thanks to those who have done such a wonderful Job! A few more pictures are required, and then this could well be nominated for GA status.Pratik.mallya (talk) 18:04, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:05, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]