User talk:Paul G

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~

snoyes 16:21, 4 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I think what you found on Wiktionary must have been quite old. Exploding Boy 13:35, Mar 22, 2004 (UTC)

Hollywood Jam

The material contained in the article Hollywood Jam is a complete and utter fabrication. See User:Morwen/Cartoon and Template:VfD-debate Hollywood Jam. I don't know how things work over at Wiktionary, but that user that posted it needs an immediate moderately long-term ban. His most recent address on en is currently in the middle of a one month block because shorter blocks didn't seem to deter him. -- Cyrius|✎ 13:40, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)

This applies to Tiny Toon Adventures The Baby-Sitters Club as well. You need to check all contributions by that user and will probably need to delete or revert them all. -- Cyrius|✎ 13:47, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Thanks Cyrius. See the discussion on my Wiktionary user page and your Wikipedia page. The user posted anonymously. I will bring this up on Wiktionary. Thanks for pointing this out. — Paul G 15:12, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Tore Uppström

Since you moved this article from Wiktionary, I wonder if you could please check who originally posted it there. / u◦p◦p◦l◦a◦n◦d 12:10, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I have had a look and the entry has been deleted. There is no entry without the diaeresis either. Neither entry has a history or "View deleted edits?" link. I'm sorry. When transferring material from Wiktionary to Wikipedia in future, I'll make a note of who the original poster was. — Paul G 12:46, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Jeremy Corbyn

You put in a request for an article on Jeremy Corbin. This already exists (as a stub) under the correctly-spelled name. Would be nice to expand it though as it is a bit thin. David | Talk 11:47, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wiktionarypar

You, along with several other editors, suggested replacing {{wiktionary}} with {{wiktionarypar}} a while ago, which is gradually being done. Netoholic is now repeatedly redirecting Template:Wiktionarypar. Please read the prior discussion of this (which I've reminded Netoholic of) at Template talk:Wiktionary and contribute. You may want to put Template:Wiktionarypar on your watchlist. Uncle G 08:47, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Donal Blaney

An article that you have been involved in editing, Donal Blaney, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donal Blaney. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Re-booting Magic WikiProject

Following various discussions and posts on the project talk page I've drafted a new version of the project page. In particular it seeks to clarify aspects of the structure of the project and guidelines regarding publication of magic methods. I'm contacting you to ask for your opinion because you recently made a helpfulcomment on one of the articles I'd edited. The draft is posted at Wikipedia:WikiProject Magic/draft magic project page. Despite linking off the project talk page and posting an announcement on the Community bulletin board there doesn't seem to have been any response yet. Any comments from you would be valued. Circusandmagicfan 16:07, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Circusandmagicfan[reply]

RE: editing wikitionary username papges

Hi Paul G, you sent me a message to ask me to stop editing wikitionary user pages, I have done no such thing to the best of my knowledge and it may be another user with the same name as me on the wikitionary site. Could you please link to the offending material. Thanks

Pluke 09:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to on OP's page. — Paul G 09:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul, Seems that I did edit your user page all that time ago! Sorry for the inconvenience, I was quite new back then. Pluke 13:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to on OP's page again. — Paul G 11:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cinesite

You may want to go to WP:DRV to have the deletion appealed. In the meantime, set up a subpage with your new version of the article so that it can be approved. bibliomaniac 15 ^{BUY NOW!} 16:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I've posted a request on WP:DRV. — Paul G 17:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ingo Molnár

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Ingo Molnár, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. mms 16:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not my article. I only fixed a double redirect. — Paul G 14:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Abrahams

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Jeffrey Abrahams, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Dali-Llama 02:15, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Linux" pronunciation

I have found this helpful page http://www.safalra.com/science/linguistics/linux-pronunciation/ which describes three ways of pronouncing "Linux". Particularly note the second pronunciation given, which is similar to the one you just removed. Would you be able to incorporate the alternative pronunciations into the Linux article? (I am not familiar with the IPA so I am wary of doing it myself.)

Also note that the Wikipedia:Manual of Style (pronunciation) states "Pronunciation transcriptions based on traditional English spelling are deprecated. Forms such as pro-NUN-see-AY-shun may be misinterpreted by people who speak a different dialect or whose first language isn't English. They can however be used in addition to the IPA version so that it's easy for people who don't know the IPA to understand them. A key can be linked from Help:Pronunciation respelling key, to make the transcription more universal across Wikipedia. It may also be helpful to add comments such as "rhymes with..." or "stress on the first syllable"."

Thanks. --121.45.229.21 (talk) 03:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. However, the source you mention gives the vowel in the second syllable as /ʌ/, the vowel in "up" as pronounced in English as spoken in southern England. I have never heard this used. I have only heard /ə/, the vowel in the first syllable of "about". The vowel used in the web page is /ʊ/, which is the vowel in "cook". This is distinct from /ə/, but some US English accents merge the two. There is a dispute between "long" and "short" i in the first syllable, but I would go as far as to say that the source you mention is mistaken when it uses /ʌ/. Certainly /ɤ/ is incorrect - the writer uses it to represent "oo" (whatever sound that is), but in IPA, this represents a consonant (resembling "g") — Paul G (talk) 13:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to find a more reliable source for Linux's IPA pronunciation and The Canadian Oxford Dictionary (which hopefully uses IPA; I'm not entirely certain about it) says it should be pronounced ˈlɪnəks, ˈlainəks, or ˈli:nəks. If you can obtain access to Oxford Reference Online (apparently "available in almost all public libraries in England"), the entry is available here. It looks like you have tried to change the pronunciation, but the article got truncated so your edit was reverted. What do you think about these alternative pronunciations, and could you please make the necessary changes? --121.45.229.21 (talk) 06:17, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your research. The Canadian dictionary is in agreement with what I have been trying to input; namely that the vowel in the second syllable is a schwa. /ai/ should be /aI/, at least in UK English - maybe that's a transcription error on your part, or maybe Canadian does use /ai/. I don't have access to the Oxford website, at least, not immediately, and "Linux" is not in the second edition of the (printed) OED. I'll try again to make the changes to the article. — Paul G (talk) 09:42, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. I have double-checked the online Canadian Oxford and the ɪ/i is printed as I have shown above. What do you think about Linus Torvalds' pronunciations in these audio files? Is this accurately depicted by /ˈlɪnʊks/ (English) and (/ˈlɪːnɤks/ (Swedish)? --121.45.229.21 (talk) 21:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An anonymous user has reversed your changes claiming that ˈlɪnʊks is the correct IPA pronunciation according to Linus. I would like to have ˈlɪnəks kept on the article seeing as it is actually written in the Canadian Oxford whereas I cannot yet find a reliable source for ˈlɪnʊks. If you could listen to the audio files I linked to in my previous comment and tell me if ˈlɪnəks or ˈlɪnʊks is a reasonable interpretation of his pronunciation I would greatly appreciate it. --121.45.229.21 (talk) 04:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. The thing is, Linus is not a native English speaker, so he can't make claims on how "Linux" should be pronounced in English. — Paul G (talk) 08:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Digeri Dingo

I have nominated Digeri Dingo, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digeri Dingo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't create this page. — Paul G (talk) 15:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tchibo

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Tchibo. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tchibo. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cleanup

Hello, Paul G. You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:40, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. When you recently edited Sparhawk (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sparrowhawk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of French National League for Liberty in Vaccination

The article French National League for Liberty in Vaccination has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find sufficient sourcing to determine notability. Article has been unsourced since its inception and has no regular editors.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SÆdon ^talk 23:00, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Paul G. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Paul G. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Paul G. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Paul G. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Purdey (The New Avengers)

The article Purdey (The New Avengers) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing WP:NFICTION/GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 17:26, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]