Talk:Biberach an der Riß

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(First comments)[edit]

I propose to rename this article to "Biberach an der Riss" (as it is known in Germany) to avoid confusion with the other Biberach (Biberach (Baden)), which is also in Baden-Württemberg. Markussep 10:30, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I agree, but I assume you mean to rename it "Biberach an der Riss, Baden-Württemberg", right?
Also: What is the protocol for using the ess-tsett in the English-language Wikipedia? Isn't the river's name actually der Riß? Or was this ß changed to ss in 2000 when the rules for ß were changed? The river is spelled "Riss" on the page List of rivers in Germany, but it's "Riß" on old maps.
Lawrence King 10:58, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It's the only Biberach on the river Riß, so Baden-Württemberg is not required, I'd say "Biberach an der Riß". About Riss or Riß, it's Riß in German wikipedia. Since the ß is allowed in article titles, we should use it. A redirect from ...Riss could be helpful. Markussep 11:06, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Outside of germany we can't easily type a ß unless we remap our keyboards, so when I search for Biberach (wikipedia. bahn.de, etc.) I use "Biberach a.d. riss", I assume other native english speakers do as well.
On an unrelated note Shakespeare's work's were first performed in Biberach, I think this should be added to the article, I can dig through my photo album and find a picture of the theater to add, also tie it into Wieland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seifried (talkcontribs) 06:05, 26 March 2007

According to the reform of Germen othography in 1996 it ought to be "Biberach an der Riss", because the vowal "i" is pronounced short. The quarrels about the definitive introduction of the reform have not ceased before this year. Now it is really definitive. So it is only a question of time, that in all new texts it will be "Riss". The Landkreis (district) of Biberach already writes the adresses of its intitutions "Biberach/Riss" Homepage of the public library.
--Ulamm (talk) 17:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proper names like Riß are usually not affected by the spelling reform. --93.130.222.112 (talk) 09:40, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move[edit]

I’ve moved this per WP:UE to an English title that dispenses with the eszett; it is entirely wrong to use it in general english.
Also, it seems a little obtuse to use an eszett here when the town's own website (http://www.biberach-riss.de/ ) doesn’t do so. Moonraker12 (talk) 14:24, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Biberach an der Riss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Biberach an der Riss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]